Best Cities for Telephone Operatorss
Cities ranked by purchasing power — where telephone operatorss get the most value from their salary after accounting for cost of living. A score above 1.00 means better than national average.
How we calculate this: City Score = (Local Salary ÷ National Median) ÷ (Local Cost ÷ National Avg Cost). A score of 1.20 means 20% better purchasing power than average.
| # | Location | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | CaliforniaState | 1.24 |
| 2 | WisconsinState | 1.21 |
| 3 | Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CAMetro | 1.21 |
| 4 | New YorkState | 1.07 |
| 5 | MassachusettsState | 1.06 |
| 6 | Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MDMetro | 1.04 |
| 7 | District of ColumbiaState | 1.03 |
| 8 | TexasState | 1.03 |
| 9 | North CarolinaState | 1.02 |
| 10 | OklahomaState | 1.01 |
| 11 | Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NHMetro | 1.01 |
| 12 | Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WVMetro | 1.01 |
| 13 | Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GAMetro | 1.00 |
| 14 | Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MIMetro | 0.99 |
| 15 | OhioState | 0.98 |
| 16 | VirginiaState | 0.98 |
| 17 | MichiganState | 0.97 |
| 18 | Columbus, OHMetro | 0.97 |
| 19 | Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, MDMetro | 0.96 |
| 20 | GeorgiaState | 0.95 |
| 21 | MarylandState | 0.93 |
| 22 | New JerseyState | 0.92 |
| 23 | FloridaState | 0.88 |
| 24 | LouisianaState | 0.83 |
Data Sources: Salary: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (OEWS). Cost of Living: BEA Regional Price Parities (2024). Rent: HUD Fair Market Rents (FY2025).