Best Cities for Statistical Assistantss

Cities ranked by purchasing power — where statistical assistantss get the most value from their salary after accounting for cost of living. A score above 1.00 means better than national average.

How we calculate this: City Score = (Local Salary ÷ National Median) ÷ (Local Cost ÷ National Avg Cost). A score of 1.20 means 20% better purchasing power than average.
#LocationScore
1CaliforniaState1.48
2ConnecticutState1.41
3MissouriState1.31
4IllinoisState1.29
5MassachusettsState1.29
6NebraskaState1.29
7New JerseyState1.27
8South CarolinaState1.27
9Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NHMetro1.24
10MinnesotaState1.19
11WashingtonState1.18
12WisconsinState1.15
13ArizonaState1.12
14FloridaState1.12
15Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WAMetro1.11
16MarylandState1.09
17Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MIMetro1.08
18MichiganState1.07
19OhioState1.05
20Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WVMetro1.05
21TennesseeState1.04
22IndianaState1.03
23KentuckyState1.03
24OklahomaState1.03
25Pittsburgh, PAMetro1.03
26PennsylvaniaState1.00
27Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TNMetro0.99
28MaineState0.96
29TexasState0.91
30Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MDMetro0.90
31New YorkState0.82
32Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TXMetro0.80
33HawaiiState0.73
Data Sources: Salary: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (OEWS). Cost of Living: BEA Regional Price Parities (2024). Rent: HUD Fair Market Rents (FY2025).