Best Cities for Fish and Game Wardenss

Cities ranked by purchasing power — where fish and game wardenss get the most value from their salary after accounting for cost of living. A score above 1.00 means better than national average.

How we calculate this: City Score = (Local Salary ÷ National Median) ÷ (Local Cost ÷ National Avg Cost). A score of 1.20 means 20% better purchasing power than average.
#LocationScore
1IowaState1.49
2IndianaState1.40
3WisconsinState1.30
4MichiganState1.28
5NevadaState1.24
6CaliforniaState1.22
7TexasState1.21
8North DakotaState1.16
9AlabamaState1.15
10GeorgiaState1.15
11Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TNMetro1.14
12ArkansasState1.13
13OhioState1.13
14TennesseeState1.12
15Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GAMetro1.11
16MarylandState1.10
17WyomingState1.08
18MissouriState1.07
19Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WVMetro1.07
20OklahomaState1.05
21IdahoState1.02
22South DakotaState1.02
23Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CAMetro1.01
24West VirginiaState1.00
25Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MDMetro1.00
26MaineState0.99
27VermontState0.99
28New YorkState0.96
29KansasState0.93
30NebraskaState0.93
31LouisianaState0.90
32New JerseyState0.90
33North CarolinaState0.88
34VirginiaState0.87
35HawaiiState0.85
36KentuckyState0.83
37MontanaState0.83
38ConnecticutState0.82
39PennsylvaniaState0.70
40Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FLMetro0.43
41FloridaState0.42
Data Sources: Salary: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (OEWS). Cost of Living: BEA Regional Price Parities (2024). Rent: HUD Fair Market Rents (FY2025).