Best Cities for Fish and Game Wardenss
Cities ranked by purchasing power — where fish and game wardenss get the most value from their salary after accounting for cost of living. A score above 1.00 means better than national average.
How we calculate this: City Score = (Local Salary ÷ National Median) ÷ (Local Cost ÷ National Avg Cost). A score of 1.20 means 20% better purchasing power than average.
| # | Location | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | IowaState | 1.49 |
| 2 | IndianaState | 1.40 |
| 3 | WisconsinState | 1.30 |
| 4 | MichiganState | 1.28 |
| 5 | NevadaState | 1.24 |
| 6 | CaliforniaState | 1.22 |
| 7 | TexasState | 1.21 |
| 8 | North DakotaState | 1.16 |
| 9 | AlabamaState | 1.15 |
| 10 | GeorgiaState | 1.15 |
| 11 | Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TNMetro | 1.14 |
| 12 | ArkansasState | 1.13 |
| 13 | OhioState | 1.13 |
| 14 | TennesseeState | 1.12 |
| 15 | Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GAMetro | 1.11 |
| 16 | MarylandState | 1.10 |
| 17 | WyomingState | 1.08 |
| 18 | MissouriState | 1.07 |
| 19 | Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WVMetro | 1.07 |
| 20 | OklahomaState | 1.05 |
| 21 | IdahoState | 1.02 |
| 22 | South DakotaState | 1.02 |
| 23 | Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CAMetro | 1.01 |
| 24 | West VirginiaState | 1.00 |
| 25 | Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MDMetro | 1.00 |
| 26 | MaineState | 0.99 |
| 27 | VermontState | 0.99 |
| 28 | New YorkState | 0.96 |
| 29 | KansasState | 0.93 |
| 30 | NebraskaState | 0.93 |
| 31 | LouisianaState | 0.90 |
| 32 | New JerseyState | 0.90 |
| 33 | North CarolinaState | 0.88 |
| 34 | VirginiaState | 0.87 |
| 35 | HawaiiState | 0.85 |
| 36 | KentuckyState | 0.83 |
| 37 | MontanaState | 0.83 |
| 38 | ConnecticutState | 0.82 |
| 39 | PennsylvaniaState | 0.70 |
| 40 | Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FLMetro | 0.43 |
| 41 | FloridaState | 0.42 |
Data Sources: Salary: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (OEWS). Cost of Living: BEA Regional Price Parities (2024). Rent: HUD Fair Market Rents (FY2025).