Best Cities for Logging Workers, All Others
Cities ranked by purchasing power — where logging workers, all others get the most value from their salary after accounting for cost of living. A score above 1.00 means better than national average.
How we calculate this: City Score = (Local Salary ÷ National Median) ÷ (Local Cost ÷ National Avg Cost). A score of 1.20 means 20% better purchasing power than average.
| # | Location | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | LouisianaState | 1.77 |
| 2 | WashingtonState | 1.24 |
| 3 | MichiganState | 1.15 |
| 4 | OregonState | 1.11 |
| 5 | Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WAMetro | 1.07 |
| 6 | North CarolinaState | 1.01 |
| 7 | West VirginiaState | 0.98 |
| 8 | MississippiState | 0.87 |
| 9 | CaliforniaState | 0.84 |
| 10 | VirginiaState | 0.82 |
| 11 | GeorgiaState | 0.73 |
Data Sources: Salary: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (OEWS). Cost of Living: BEA Regional Price Parities (2024). Rent: HUD Fair Market Rents (FY2025).