Best Cities for Layout Workers, Metal and Plastics
Cities ranked by purchasing power — where layout workers, metal and plastics get the most value from their salary after accounting for cost of living. A score above 1.00 means better than national average.
How we calculate this: City Score = (Local Salary ÷ National Median) ÷ (Local Cost ÷ National Avg Cost). A score of 1.20 means 20% better purchasing power than average.
| # | Location | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WAMetro | 1.69 |
| 2 | KansasState | 1.38 |
| 3 | HawaiiState | 1.25 |
| 4 | WashingtonState | 1.24 |
| 5 | MaineState | 1.17 |
| 6 | OregonState | 1.14 |
| 7 | Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WAMetro | 1.09 |
| 8 | VirginiaState | 1.06 |
| 9 | Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MIMetro | 1.06 |
| 10 | CaliforniaState | 1.05 |
| 11 | MichiganState | 1.04 |
| 12 | WisconsinState | 1.03 |
| 13 | PennsylvaniaState | 0.96 |
| 14 | Pittsburgh, PAMetro | 0.96 |
| 15 | Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CAMetro | 0.93 |
| 16 | MassachusettsState | 0.92 |
| 17 | FloridaState | 0.90 |
| 18 | GeorgiaState | 0.88 |
| 19 | Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NHMetro | 0.88 |
| 20 | New YorkState | 0.87 |
| 21 | TexasState | 0.79 |
| 22 | TennesseeState | 0.74 |
| 23 | South CarolinaState | 0.71 |
| 24 | AlabamaState | 0.68 |
| 25 | New MexicoState | 0.66 |
Data Sources: Salary: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (OEWS). Cost of Living: BEA Regional Price Parities (2024). Rent: HUD Fair Market Rents (FY2025).