Best Cities for Fashion Designerss
Cities ranked by purchasing power — where fashion designerss get the most value from their salary after accounting for cost of living. A score above 1.00 means better than national average.
How we calculate this: City Score = (Local Salary ÷ National Median) ÷ (Local Cost ÷ National Avg Cost). A score of 1.20 means 20% better purchasing power than average.
| # | Location | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | MassachusettsState | 1.18 |
| 2 | New HampshireState | 1.17 |
| 3 | Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NHMetro | 1.16 |
| 4 | New JerseyState | 1.15 |
| 5 | OhioState | 1.12 |
| 6 | VirginiaState | 1.12 |
| 7 | ColoradoState | 1.10 |
| 8 | New YorkState | 1.08 |
| 9 | Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SCMetro | 1.06 |
| 10 | GeorgiaState | 1.04 |
| 11 | North CarolinaState | 0.98 |
| 12 | Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FLMetro | 0.98 |
| 13 | VermontState | 0.96 |
| 14 | ConnecticutState | 0.94 |
| 15 | WashingtonState | 0.94 |
| 16 | Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MDMetro | 0.94 |
| 17 | Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WAMetro | 0.92 |
| 18 | MichiganState | 0.85 |
| 19 | KansasState | 0.81 |
| 20 | PennsylvaniaState | 0.81 |
| 21 | Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TXMetro | 0.80 |
| 22 | Kansas City, MO-KSMetro | 0.79 |
| 23 | WisconsinState | 0.76 |
| 24 | Pittsburgh, PAMetro | 0.72 |
| 25 | Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WVMetro | 0.68 |
| 26 | MaineState | 0.61 |
| 27 | Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WIMetro | 0.57 |
| 28 | ArizonaState | 0.56 |
| 29 | IndianaState | 0.56 |
| 30 | HawaiiState | 0.54 |
| 31 | MinnesotaState | 0.53 |
| 32 | FloridaState | 0.52 |
| 33 | TexasState | 0.52 |
Data Sources: Salary: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (OEWS). Cost of Living: BEA Regional Price Parities (2024). Rent: HUD Fair Market Rents (FY2025).