Best Cities for Entertainment Attendants and Related Workers, All Others
Cities ranked by purchasing power — where entertainment attendants and related workers, all others get the most value from their salary after accounting for cost of living. A score above 1.00 means better than national average.
How we calculate this: City Score = (Local Salary ÷ National Median) ÷ (Local Cost ÷ National Avg Cost). A score of 1.20 means 20% better purchasing power than average.
| # | Location | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | New YorkState | 1.70 |
| 2 | MissouriState | 1.61 |
| 3 | NevadaState | 1.48 |
| 4 | ColoradoState | 1.33 |
| 5 | MichiganState | 1.33 |
| 6 | AlabamaState | 1.30 |
| 7 | LouisianaState | 1.24 |
| 8 | UtahState | 1.22 |
| 9 | North CarolinaState | 1.21 |
| 10 | HawaiiState | 1.20 |
| 11 | IowaState | 1.15 |
| 12 | Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CAMetro | 1.15 |
| 13 | PennsylvaniaState | 1.10 |
| 14 | CaliforniaState | 1.09 |
| 15 | Pittsburgh, PAMetro | 1.07 |
| 16 | New JerseyState | 1.06 |
| 17 | Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MDMetro | 1.04 |
| 18 | MinnesotaState | 1.01 |
| 19 | OregonState | 1.00 |
| 20 | TennesseeState | 1.00 |
| 21 | Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WIMetro | 0.99 |
| 22 | Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FLMetro | 0.97 |
| 23 | Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, MDMetro | 0.96 |
| 24 | MarylandState | 0.93 |
| 25 | Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TNMetro | 0.91 |
| 26 | Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FLMetro | 0.90 |
| 27 | FloridaState | 0.89 |
| 28 | MontanaState | 0.85 |
| 29 | OhioState | 0.83 |
| 30 | TexasState | 0.83 |
| 31 | Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TXMetro | 0.82 |
| 32 | Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GAMetro | 0.81 |
| 33 | GeorgiaState | 0.78 |
Data Sources: Salary: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (OEWS). Cost of Living: BEA Regional Price Parities (2024). Rent: HUD Fair Market Rents (FY2025).