Best Cities for Continuous Mining Machine Operatorss

Cities ranked by purchasing power — where continuous mining machine operatorss get the most value from their salary after accounting for cost of living. A score above 1.00 means better than national average.

How we calculate this: City Score = (Local Salary ÷ National Median) ÷ (Local Cost ÷ National Avg Cost). A score of 1.20 means 20% better purchasing power than average.
#LocationScore
1MinnesotaState1.50
2West VirginiaState1.49
3WyomingState1.48
4NevadaState1.38
5IndianaState1.28
6ColoradoState1.25
7IllinoisState1.24
8AlabamaState1.10
9Pittsburgh, PAMetro1.06
10OhioState1.04
11IdahoState1.02
12MichiganState1.01
13North CarolinaState1.01
14PennsylvaniaState1.01
15FloridaState1.00
16GeorgiaState0.99
17VirginiaState0.99
18ArizonaState0.98
19Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MIMetro0.97
20UtahState0.96
21CaliforniaState0.92
22NebraskaState0.92
23KentuckyState0.91
24ArkansasState0.90
25MissouriState0.86
26New MexicoState0.86
27OklahomaState0.86
28Kansas City, MO-KSMetro0.84
29TexasState0.83
30New YorkState0.67
Data Sources: Salary: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (OEWS). Cost of Living: BEA Regional Price Parities (2024). Rent: HUD Fair Market Rents (FY2025).