Best Cities for Choreographerss
Cities ranked by purchasing power — where choreographerss get the most value from their salary after accounting for cost of living. A score above 1.00 means better than national average.
How we calculate this: City Score = (Local Salary ÷ National Median) ÷ (Local Cost ÷ National Avg Cost). A score of 1.20 means 20% better purchasing power than average.
| # | Location | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | New YorkState | 2.78 |
| 2 | MinnesotaState | 1.38 |
| 3 | Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WIMetro | 1.36 |
| 4 | OhioState | 1.34 |
| 5 | CaliforniaState | 1.22 |
| 6 | Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, MDMetro | 1.20 |
| 7 | Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CAMetro | 1.16 |
| 8 | MarylandState | 1.14 |
| 9 | Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MDMetro | 1.07 |
| 10 | LouisianaState | 1.03 |
| 11 | NebraskaState | 0.98 |
| 12 | IndianaState | 0.90 |
| 13 | TexasState | 0.88 |
| 14 | AlabamaState | 0.81 |
| 15 | South DakotaState | 0.80 |
| 16 | FloridaState | 0.65 |
| 17 | IllinoisState | 0.64 |
| 18 | UtahState | 0.61 |
Data Sources: Salary: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (OEWS). Cost of Living: BEA Regional Price Parities (2024). Rent: HUD Fair Market Rents (FY2025).