Best Cities for Animal Scientistss

Cities ranked by purchasing power — where animal scientistss get the most value from their salary after accounting for cost of living. A score above 1.00 means better than national average.

How we calculate this: City Score = (Local Salary ÷ National Median) ÷ (Local Cost ÷ National Avg Cost). A score of 1.20 means 20% better purchasing power than average.
#LocationScore
1TexasState2.02
2WisconsinState1.32
3MinnesotaState1.31
4KansasState1.29
5South DakotaState1.23
6IowaState1.22
7PennsylvaniaState1.16
8North DakotaState1.13
9WashingtonState1.12
10Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WIMetro1.12
11Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MDMetro1.09
12Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WVMetro1.06
13MarylandState1.03
14Kansas City, MO-KSMetro0.99
15MichiganState0.94
16NebraskaState0.88
17Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, MDMetro0.87
18IllinoisState0.71
Data Sources: Salary: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (OEWS). Cost of Living: BEA Regional Price Parities (2024). Rent: HUD Fair Market Rents (FY2025).