Best Cities for Animal Scientistss
Cities ranked by purchasing power — where animal scientistss get the most value from their salary after accounting for cost of living. A score above 1.00 means better than national average.
How we calculate this: City Score = (Local Salary ÷ National Median) ÷ (Local Cost ÷ National Avg Cost). A score of 1.20 means 20% better purchasing power than average.
| # | Location | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | TexasState | 2.02 |
| 2 | WisconsinState | 1.32 |
| 3 | MinnesotaState | 1.31 |
| 4 | KansasState | 1.29 |
| 5 | South DakotaState | 1.23 |
| 6 | IowaState | 1.22 |
| 7 | PennsylvaniaState | 1.16 |
| 8 | North DakotaState | 1.13 |
| 9 | WashingtonState | 1.12 |
| 10 | Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WIMetro | 1.12 |
| 11 | Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MDMetro | 1.09 |
| 12 | Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WVMetro | 1.06 |
| 13 | MarylandState | 1.03 |
| 14 | Kansas City, MO-KSMetro | 0.99 |
| 15 | MichiganState | 0.94 |
| 16 | NebraskaState | 0.88 |
| 17 | Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, MDMetro | 0.87 |
| 18 | IllinoisState | 0.71 |
Data Sources: Salary: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (OEWS). Cost of Living: BEA Regional Price Parities (2024). Rent: HUD Fair Market Rents (FY2025).